Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, a law that took effect in 1970, requires employers to provide employees with a safe workplace. Specifically, section 5(a)(1), more commonly known as the General Duty Clause, mandates: “Each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.”
The General Duty Clause extends OSHA’s authority beyond the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs) when a recognized workplace hazard exists or potentially exists. OSHA can cite the General Duty Clause if a recognized serious hazard exists in the workplace and the employer does not take reasonable steps to reduce or eliminate the hazard.
The General Duty Clause is used only if no other standard applies. OSHA has used it for hazards like ergonomics, failing to train machine operators, workplace violence, and heat stress, among other areas.
Proving that a hazard was “recognized” may require OSHA to show that the employer was aware of or should have been aware of the hazard. For example, if a company had numerous ergonomic injuries and employees frequently reported ergonomic concerns, OSHA might show that the company was aware of the hazard.
Some hazards may be recognized in certain industries or by manufacturer warnings. For example, forklift operator manuals require wearing the seat belt. The OSHA regulation doesn’t mention seat belts, but if operators don’t wear them, OSHA could use the forklift manual to show a recognized hazard.
In rare cases, OSHA may argue that a hazard is so obvious that any reasonable person would have recognized it. For example, if storage racks in a warehouse have structural damage, that should be a recognized hazard.
The hazard must also be capable of causing death or serious physical harm. Serious injuries include, but are not limited to, bone fractures, amputations, cuts or lacerations that require sutures, and burns from electrical, chemical, or thermal sources. In addition, OSHA must consider if the hazard exposure is regular and ongoing, or of limited frequency or duration.
To illustrate, OSHA has used the General Duty Clause to cite employers for failing to train machine operators because most industrial machines have the potential to cause serious injuries and the exposure is ongoing.
There’s much more to the General Duty Clause, but two key areas are the recognition of the hazard and the seriousness of the potential injury. Remember that a hazard could be recognized — and have the potential for serious injury — even if no injuries occurred yet.
Join us for a deep dive into the General Duty Clause and how you can stay compliant, protect your workforce, and avoid costly citations. Our upcoming webinar, Protect Your Workforce by Recognizing Hazards, Preventing Harm, and Avoiding Costly Violations on Thursday, September 25, at 1:00 PM CDT, will cover what the General Duty Clause is – and what it’s not, how OSHA determines when and how to apply it, and more. We’ll wrap up with a 15-minute Q&A session to address your questions and compliance concerns.
Since conditions in the workplace may be constantly changing, identifying hazards may require conducting regular inspections and audits. The Audits feature in the J. J. Keller® SAFETY MANAGEMENT SUITE provides numerous ready-to-use checklists with questions on dozens of topics. The results can help you identify potential hazards or compliance issues and address them before an incident occurs
Sign up to receive the weekly EHS Insider email newsletter for safety articles, news headlines, regulatory alerts, industry events, webcasts, and more.